"Tainted?" What about You Chua?

 Chew Mei Fun "the Pure Crystal," Guilty by Association

 

"Tell me who your friends are and I'll tell you who you are." So the saying goes, and consequently   there is no point talking about " MCA’s “pure as crystal”

Specimens of  Identical plumage

candidate Chew Mei Fun." We've heard better jokes.

 Chua Calls Chew Mei Fun "spotless Crystal"  and Anwar Tainted.

Chua Soi Lek the spotless, the man without sin, has pointed his finger at Anwar and called him,

Why was he not charged  or unnatural sex ?

"Tainted."


Coming from Chua Soi Lek one wonders if this doctor is a  Schizophrenic living in a world of his own, a world of "make belief."

Was it not this man who got caught on video performing unnatural sex on a woman in Batu Pahat?

Did he not come out in the open and  admit that it was him?

A recording of the admission is on youtube but we shall  not feature it here for reasons of obscenity.

Why is it then that the attorney General and the Police failed to act?

Aren't these acts of  "failing to act," and acting " halfheartedly" acts  of dereliction of duty? 

The police should act because the filming of a senior minister in such a compromising position is a matter of National Security.

Anyone capable of doing that,  is capable of doing much more than that, to more senior ministers,  and then hold them to black mail, and they could  be blackmailed for many reasons, for political favours, for contracts, for money, for promotions, to use influence to carry out illegal activities, for drug related activities and what more do you have -the list is unending.

The next question that goes a begging is;  In the face of this how do we know if our ministers, and the Prime Minister himself are not being blackmailed by this group of film makers or for that matter by other groups too?

Is our government compromised by blackmailers?

Considering the amount of corruption cases involving people in this government for which there is hardly any prosecution, considering the offenses that go unchecked by Ministers and their children, the question that begs to be asked is; Is our Government compromised or just plain dirty, not just Tainted?

Chew Mei Fun will be better adviced to stand as an independent and not as an MCA candidate, to preserve her "crystal pure image" if she really has one or  for that matter even as any BN candidate as that compounds the issue.

Now to focus on Chua Soi Lek again.

By his own admission he has said that the man on the tape is him, "who did it is obvious but it is not important now" that is exactly what Chua told the press, as reported in the Star on 2 January 2008.

If it was obvious to him, then  he knew who did it.

Why then did the police not act?

He did not go into details after admitting it was "obvious who did it?"

Were national secrets revealed to the parties who did it, that he did not want to go into the details.

Why did the police not act, this clearly is a matter a national security.

In the interview with the media  he was asked again:

Q: Datuk, do you know who is behind the tape?  
A: If you look at the statement, what is left out is why have they done this tape. The reason is obvious. But that is not in the statement.

He clearly implies that he knows who done it, but is refusing to take them to task and the big question is Why?

The only conclusion one can draw is that those who were out there to fix him were people from high places, from withing the BN or government circles, and he Chua was part of those circles and there were more issues that could have been brought up if he decided to fight it,

Now one important item is the issue of  National Security. Not  the Minister of Home affairs, nor the Police not event he Prime Minister decided to get to the bottom of the issue and bring the culprits of this filming to the book. So much for National security and how this government treats such issues with scorn and makes political issues issues of national security.

That is the National Security bit, how about the Chua's " Crystal Clean image" compared with Anwa?

One thing for certain the people gave Anwar their overwhelming vote of confidence at the last elections.

As the leader of the opposition he was more popular than even the Prime Minister having won the popular vote Chu had to hide he dared not come out to even contest he would have lost miserably, so who does Chua really think is tainted he or Anwar?

Why was Chua not  charged in court for performing an unnatural sex act which he has admitted he has done?

Why is Anwar being charged and appeals being made to ensure the is put away when Anwar was found not guilty by a court of law, and when the prosecution was guilty of tampering with evidence so important to the case, by a senior cop who is a lawyer and who should have known that he had no right to tamper with evidence. His job was to get to the truth,so why did he do that was he trying to circumvent the truth?

The same section that was used to charge  Anwar  is the section against which this scoundrel should have been charged? So what is so crystal pure?

The sections are;

Carnal intercourse against the order of nature

377A

.

Any person who has sexual connection with another person

by the introduction of the penis into the anus or mouth of the other

person is said to commit carnal intercourse against the order of

nature.

Explanation

—Penetration is sufficient to constitute the sexual connection

necessary to the offence described in this section.

Punishment for committing carnal intercourse against the order

of nature

377B

.

Whoever voluntarily commits carnal intercourse against

the order of nature shall be punished with imprisonment for a term

which may extend to twenty years, and shall also be liable to whipping

If the punishment for the offence is up to 20 years coupled with the whipping, why was Chua Soi Lek let off and is in Anwar being hounded by the BN? 

Chua admitted to his wrong doing, Anwar did not and was acquitted by a court of law and yet Chau goes of Scott free and can even call Anwar names. Is this Malaysian justice?

The prosecution, to nail him has also taken the unprecedented step to bring in a legal expert from outside to prosecute.

Why weren't the same measures taken in the Altantuya case? In the Kugan case? In the Beng Hock case where the prosecution made fools of themselves?

What is crystal clear and not pure  is that this man should have been charged and jailed for an offense he has admitted to, there is irrefutable evidence in the form of a tape recording to which ha admitted was him, Anwar was wrongly jailed for years for offenses he did not commit, while this man walks free.

So Chew Mei Fun if you are Crystal Pure as Chua claims you are, you should disassociate yourself from such company or be guilty of association and be placed in the same category as Chua Soi Lek and this crooked government that practices selective prosecution.

Only two days ago Muhyiddin came out with Mei Fun and Liow, to say that there will be np personal attacks now this goes to prove the credibility of the BN and the MCA, this is their immediate past President.