Sunday, April 14, 2019


 Forget China surrendering Jho Low he is part of the Najib Jho Low plan that would have sold this country to the Chinese and which was the most significant strategic acquisition China would have ever made in its history.

China is beholden to both Najib and Jho Low, to send Jho Low over is to be ungrateful the architect of the plan, and to send Jho Low would also mean to betray Najib who was ready to sell his country to China.

Why  do you think the son of the man who ordered May 13, who despised the Chinese would send his son to China to learn Mandarin.

Malaysians must now watch and see if China is really a sincere friend or is it just taking maximum  advantage of us.

Surely the ECRL and other expensive deals with a corrupt government in Malaysia (during Najib's time) was opportune for the Chinese to ink  mega lop sided agreements involving billions of Dollars,  enrich some crooked UMNO men in Malaysia  or maybe just one with  billions as well ,  as most expedient way they could  achieve one of their most significant strategic advantages in Chinese and word History.

Looking like a new Union of States like the USSR.

Of all countries China which has very strict laws for its own citizens and its politicians where the punishment for corruption  that involves a million Yuan  leave alone billions of Yuan is death by a firing squad, and the standard of judgment in  a Court trial is not innocent until proven guilty as in our case, but the reverse of "Guilty until proven innocent", could stoop that low. To say that it was just a good business deal is to regard ordinary Malaysians stupid, for after all that was what we all were to allow a corrupt regime like UMNO to rule us for sixty years.

On all accounts Malaysia gave in to China, it was to a very great extent cowed down by its economic and military might and that can't be denied, to do anything else would have been economic suicide, and tough arm tactics by China.

The government of the day realises that the railway will not be an investment from which it will reap profits but rather a liability that has to be maintained at the taxpayers expense as no railway in the world runs at a profit, so it is not really the best alternative mode fo transportation  of people, but essentially to give in to a bully, they gave in to the  bully -  China.


Why then one wonders did China agree to loan Malaysia the money for this exorbitant project at a time the country was really in  financial mess and China knew we were weak financially?

Well there could have been more reasons than one for this project,and to get Malaysia indebted to  a level we would never be able to repay China and thus economically colonialise  the nation for a very long time if not for posterity.

China's claims in the South China Sea keeps shifting and it has claimed the James Shoal which we call Beting Serupai and China refers to as Zēngmǔ Ànshā  which is a mere 45 nautical miles or about 82 kilometers off Sarawak's coastline and about 1,800 kilometers off the coast of China.

 Malaysia has  asserted its jurisdiction over its continental shelf including the areas in and around James Shoal, Parson's Shoal and the Lydie Shoal. The activities of the Malaysian authorities include the construction and maintenance of a light-buoy on nearby Parson's Shoal on round the clock 365 days a year basis, constant  patrolling and policing of the area by the  Royal Malaysian Navy and the Malaysian Maritime Enforcement Agency undertaking economic activities like exploration for and production of hydrocarbon resources on a sustained basis.

This  shoal  claimed to be the southernmost territory of China by the People's Republic of China changing the British name of the Shoal to Zeng Mu Tan in 1933, and renamed it Zeng Mu Ansha in 1947.

China had the arrogance of  of sending the Peoples Republican Army's Navy placed a sovereignty stele  in the maritime area of the shoal to mark it as Chinese territory on 26 March 1990, again in January 1992, on 15 January 1995, on 20 April 2010 and as very recently as 2012, if this is not wilful aggression and bullying one wonders what is.


The Nine-Dash Line—at  times also referred to as the "10-dash line" and the "11-dash line"—refers to the undefined, vaguely located, demarcation line used initially by the Rebublic of China (1912-1949) in the pre Communist era  and subsequently the governments of the Republic ovf China (ROC / Taiwan) and the Peoples Republic of China  (PRC), for their claims of the major part of the South China Sea.

The contested area in the South China Sea includes the Paracel Islands off the Coast of Vietnam, the
Spartly Islands (Claimed by Malaysia, Vietnam and Philippines) and various other areas including the Paratas Islands  the Macclessfield Bank and the Scarbourough Shoal and encompasses another arrogant claim of Chinese man made Islands referred to as the "Great Wall of Sand."

Whilst maintaining that always that they intend to find a peaceful solution to these preposterous expansionist claims, China still uses its military and economic might to do what it pleases in the South China Sea over the weaker South East Asian nations.

China adds and takes away territory from this map almost at will.

Its claims that these are historically theirs can hold no water.  The vast majority of international legal experts have concluded that China's claims based on historical claims are invalid. Many ambiguities also arise from the notion of historical claims as a basis for claiming sovereignty; China's position is essentially ambiguous.

China is a signatory to United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS), and yet China refuses to follow the conventions and rules of UNCLos and goes by what it claims are historic facts which are not recognised  as legitimate claims by UNCLOS.


The Chinese have shown a keen interest in the development of areas around Port Klang and Melaka, so there is a possibility that thy may lay claim to these ports either by economic subjugation or as they more often like to claim by Historic means by adding these places as the Red Dash lines cannot be discounted.

The ECRL from Port Klang to Kuantan will provide the perfect means of transporting material from Port Klang to Kuantan and subsequently to China, will Malaysia then become part of China, will we be required to use Chinese passports then, and judging from what has happened in Tibet and many of the inner regions of China this is not an impossibility.

With Port Klang  takeen China can effectively stop all sea freight bound for China at Port Klang and have it loaded on trains to be transported either to Kuantan or an extension of the ECRL that will go all the way to China.

Had Najib been around this would have been the most certain plan of action and I believe should Najib come back this will most certainly be the case.

Kuantan will strategically become the eastern corner of the Navy of the Peoples Republic of China and possibly also be home to their air force and Nuclear basis.

If Kuantan can be added  we'll  lose more than just Kuantan but Peninsular Malaysia as a whole too.

Do we need to bring aggression to our shores.


Well the answer is a simple no, to have Najib back and in the drivers seat is the fastest way to set up a puppet regime in Malaysia.

Some people will say that China has a strict policy of non interference.

Yes that is what China always claims, try talking to the Chinese about the Uighur adn they'll say you are interfering in their internal affairs.
Ask a Malaysian NGO to raise the problem and you'll get the same response. Ever heard of even PAS or UMNO raising the issue?

Mahathir sent Uighurs whom China demanded sent back to them to Turkey, Mahathir can stand up to them not Hadi, not Najib.

Getting back to interfering in our internal affairs I am sure you have not forgotten all the BN and UMNO banners printed n expensive cloth and supplied to  the BN for the last elections, the free T-shirts, and God  alone knows what else.

The Chinese like UMNO misread the situation as htey were so confident Najib was going to win the elections.

This is the  reason UMNO must open its eyes, it is not the Malaysian Chinese like Lim Guan Eng or Lim Kit Siang who are the threat to the Malays and their religion, it is UMNO and the China Chinese.


No comments:

Post a Comment